Mobility “costs” in Europe and in Emilia Romagna about 30% of total consumption.
Only in urban mobility accounts for 20% of consumption of the city. And yes that various accredited studies and experience of some model city, show that the shift range of 4-5 km is ideal to be covered by bicycle.
Unaware of this fact, we insist to impose / us-the car around town. For safety reasons, the lack of infrastruttre, for the poor quality of those present.
John Sasso also deals with the years of college studies on the mobility of small, flat bike paths. During her research a few years ago ran into this document, which considers a model for the way how it tackled the problem of urban mobility.
Bolzano with this plan has “programmed” to go up to a yearly average rate of transport of bikes intraurbano of 15%.
Means the annual average of 20% and 10% in summer and winter.
The current annual average (2011) is 20%!
[issuu width=660 printButtonEnabled=false backgroundColor=%23222222 documentId=111129174729-284525a1d8a04cb59f1396bb156f6ed6 name=piano_mobilita_ciclistica_bz_001 username=bioarchitettura tag=ciclabili unit=px id=a08c6920-7b36-4cb7-afbb-a9844e5aa2b3 v=2in times of crisis, the cycling can:
THE TOWN:
to reduce the cost of maintenance of roads
to avoid public works for the adaptation of infrastructure to the growing automotive loads
a better distribution of household spending spread over a territory and an incentive in the grassroots
FAMILIES:
to move in safer, quicker, more certain, more pleasure
to be able to meet and socialize
allowing children the conquest of space and territory
save on fuel, on the second machine, the repairs
to have more personal resources available
After several meetings and presentations of research conducted.
I am always available to discuss improving the region together.
John Sasso
If you care, your say:]